Once again it is necessary to reiterate the true, Catholic, and biblical teaching on Satan and demons. Contrary to what Superior General of the Society of Jesus Fr. Arturo Sosa stated in a recent interview, the Church does not teach that Satan is merely a symbol or an idea. He is not the “personification of evil”; he is a person, an individual creature, a fallen angelic being (as are all demons). Scripture uses personal pronouns in referring to Satan and demons (e.g., he, him, they). The Catechism of the Catholic Church affirms that Satan is an existing creature, a fallen angel who is envious of us and is a murderer from the beginning:
- Behind the disobedient choice of our first parents lurks a seductive voice, opposed to God, which makes them fall into death out of envy. Scripture and the Church’s Tradition see in this being a fallen angel, called “Satan” or the “devil.” The Church teaches that Satan was at first a good angel, made by God: The devil and the other demons were indeed created naturally good by God, but they became evil by their own doing (CCC # 391).
- Scripture witnesses to the disastrous influence of the one Jesus calls “a murderer from the beginning,” who would even try to divert Jesus from the mission received from his Father. “The reason the Son of God appeared was to destroy the works of the devil.” In its consequences the gravest of these works was the mendacious seduction that led man to disobey God (CCC # 394).
This is Church teaching. Let no one be misled by the Fr. Sosa’s erroneous statements or by the implications that follow from his unfortunate, repeated remarks. Let no one be so unwise as to dismiss the truth that we have an enemy who is very much alive who commands legions of fallen angels. We must accept this as a definitive teaching of the faith and be sober about it.
Any exorcist or anyone who has ever assisted in an exorcism can well affirm Satan’s reality and his deep hatred for humanity and all that pertains to God.
As a more extended lesson, I’d like to point out some things I have written before about certain teachings and cautions that come from the Rite of Exorcism.
The Rite of Exorcism presupposes the Catholic teaching that Satan and all demons are persons. They are addressed as persons and commanded to reveal their names, ranks, and other pertinent information. These angelic persons respond, often reluctantly and with fury at first, but later, as their power is broken, with cries and whimpers. The exorcist is clearly addressing an angelic person, a fallen angel who then reacts and responds.
As he is dealing with a being who is both a creature of God and a fallen angelic person, the exorcist must find a balance. Sadly, he must usually inflict pain upon demons in order to drive them out. This is done through the prayers of the Rite of Exorcism and through other things recommended by the rite such as the use of holy water, the use of relics, the touch of a stole, and the use of the Holy Cross.
The exorcist must be careful not to hate demons or harbor unjust anger toward them. If he were to do so, they would have him; he would be drawn into their territory. If they can get him to hate and have vengeful anger, he will be theirs, little better than they save for the possibility that he can still repent.
Hence, the exorcist and any who would pray for deliverance from demons for themselves or others, do well to stay inside the norms of the Church and Scripture. These norms warn and set limits for those who would confront demons, lest they stray by pride or anger.
What are some of these norms? Here are just a few, but they are properly cautionary to be sure:
- A lay person should never undertake to drive out demons except by the following simple formula: “I command you, all evil spirits, to leave me at once in the name of Jesus Christ the Lord.” At no time should a lay person ever engage a demon in conversation, ask questions, or in any way seek information.
- Priests who only engage in minor exorcisms are similarly limited. While they are permitted to use more elaborate imprecatory prayers (found in the Manuals of Minor Exorcisms), priests are not to go beyond the commands therein. They are not to ask questions or to demand names or signs from demons.
- Only appointed exorcists, delegated by the bishop, may or should ask things such as these: names and numbers of demons, their time of entry, why they possessed the individual, their rank, and so forth. The rite makes clear that only necessary questions should be asked. Other extraneous information is both unnecessary and potentially harmful.
- Within the formal Rite of Exorcism, an exorcist does well to stick to the formulas, expressions, and norms of the rite. Banter, insulting language, and toe-to-toe debate are to be avoided. Good exorcists indicate that returning to the prayers of the rite is essential when demons seek to engage in debate, ridicule, and/or diversionary talk. Obmutesce pater mendacii (Be silent, father of lies) is a quick command from the rite to order the demons to be silent, and it is a good way to refuse to enter into pointless conversation.
Scripture also attests to the need to refrain from reviling demons:
For even Michael the archangel, when he disputed with the devil and argued about the body of Moses, did not dare pronounce against him a reviling judgment, but said, “The Lord rebuke you!” (Jude 1:9)
Further, hate and ridicule of any person (angelic or human) whom God has created is an ungodly attitude. Scripture says,
For you O Lord love all things that are and loathe nothing that you have made; for you would not fashion what you hate (Wisdom 11:24).
Therefore, anyone who confronts demons or suffers their oppression is warned that hatred, unjust anger, reviling, and ridiculing, is no way to fight them, for if we do so we become like them.
That said, exorcists and priests must often use strong language approved by the minor and major prayers of exorcism, most of which are drawn from Scripture or Sacred Tradition.
Consider, for example, the following rebuke of Satan from Scripture:
How are you fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! How are you cut down to the ground, who did weaken the nations! For you have said in your heart, “I will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God: I will sit also upon the mount of the congregation, in the farthest sides of the north: I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will be like the most High.” Yet you shall be brought down to Sheol, to the depths of the lake of fire (Is 14:12-15).
These verses speak truth. They do not revile; they state what happened and point to Lucifer’s prideful fall.
The Rite of Exorcism has collected many descriptions from Scripture and Tradition. They are not intended to ridicule or revile but rather to remind Satan of who and what he has chosen to become. They remind him of his pride, his destruction by God’s justice, his ultimate fate, and the many ways he seeks to harm us. Consider, then, some of the “titles” and descriptions of Satan drawn from both the old and new rites of exorcism:
- Enemy of the faith
- Foe of the human race
- Carrier of death
- Robber of life
- Shirker of justice
- Root of evil
- Fomenter of vice
- Seducer of men
- Traitor of the nations
- Instigator of envy
- Font of avarice
- Source of discord
- Exciter of sorrows
- Seducer full of deceit and lies
- Enemy of virtue
- Persecutor of the innocent
- Horrible dragon
- Prince of accursed murder
- Author of incest
- Leader of sacrilege
- Teacher of all negative action
- Teacher of heretics
- Inventor of every obscenity
- Hateful one
- Unclean spirit
- Infernal adversary
- Evil dragon
- Inventor and teacher of every lie
- Enemy of man’s salvation
- Prince of this world
- Deceiver of the human race
- Ancient foe of mankind
- Father of lies
- Evil dragon
- Cunning serpent
(I have compiled a pdf containing a list of these in both Latin and English here: Titles of Satan from the Rite of Exorcism.)
Thus, whether driving out Satan in a major exorcism or seeking to expel his oppression in a minor exorcism, all are cautioned not to stray from the understandings and descriptions of Satan that the Church provides in Scripture and Sacred Tradition. Again, the reason for this is that Satan seeks to draw us into his world of hatred and revilement. Do not go there in your thoughts and surely not in your heart.
It may be hard to accept, but God does not hate Satan. God does not hate even the worst of sinners. Justice requires God to recognize the final disposition of a person (angelic or human). Some are justly permitted to live apart from God’s kingdom in a hellacious parallel universe; that is their permanent choice. But God does not hate fallen angels or fallen humans. God is love, and love does not hate—and neither should we.
We ought to be sober about what sin has done to demons, fallen angels who were once glorious. Now, through the disfigurement of sin, they are in darkness and are horribly contrary to the glory for which they were made. They are to be pitied and kept at a distance. They will not change because angels choose once and for all. Their lies are to be resisted. Though they can still appear as lightsome, it is only for a time, and then their terrifying state of horror and darkness roars forth.
Remember, too, what the Catechism says about Satan’s power and why he permits some limited influence by demons:
The power of Satan is, nonetheless, not infinite. He is only a creature, powerful from the fact that he is pure spirit, but still a creature. He cannot prevent the building up of God’s reign. Although Satan may act in the world out of hatred for God and his kingdom in Christ Jesus, and although his action may cause grave injuries—of a spiritual nature and, indirectly, even of a physical nature—to each man and to society, the action is permitted by divine providence which with strength and gentleness guides human and cosmic history. It is a great mystery that providence should permit diabolical activity, but “we know that in everything God works for good with those who love him” (CCC #395).
Do not be deceived. Satan is real and we must resist him, strong in our faith. However, do not be so terrified that you forget that God, His angels, and the grace He bestows on us are more powerful and that God limits what demons can do. Trust God; call to Him; frequently recite the 91st Psalm. Be sober and watchful and stay distant from the once-glorious fallen angels we rightly call demons.
Cross-posted at the Catholic Standard: Satan is Real
13 Replies to “Satan is Real”
So would it be heresy by the Superior General to deny the teaching or is this apostasy? The follow on notice the stated “like all Catholics he believes” is either a lie or at least weaponized ambiguity so still not straight up honest.
Arguably he is engaging in formal heresy, but it is not for me to formally declares this and apply censure. He should certainly be ordered to publicly recant. This is why it is so infuriating that no one in Rome who has the competence to do so will require this under pain of canonical penalty. In effect the faithful are without shepherds in high places. The Shepherd must drive away the wolf, but those tasked to do so in cases like this are silent. Apostasy would not likely apply since he is not directly denying a truth about God.
Thank you Msgr. Pope.
This is what I find most disappointing – that there has been virtually no response from our bishops.
Thank you Msgr.
Years and years ago, I was kicked out of a Jesuit high school. Every now and then, some Jesuit does something to make me feel not so bad about myself that that happened, such as this Fr. Arturo Sosa fellow. But really, guys, you shouldn’t put your immortal souls in jeopardy just to assuage my hurt feelings.
It is hard to pity demons! I suppose we have to distinguish between sympathy or empathy (sorrow with a connection) and pity (sorrow with no connection)? It helps when we know that God does not hate them.
I have definitely learnt something here, including the bit about inappropriate anger and hate towards demons being the domain of Satan.
Personally, the “pity Satan” part, I don’t agree with. Jesus weeps for His beloved city of Jerusalem, but He expresses no pity for Satan or the demons He expels. I even question if it is possible for a human person to pity a spiritual substance. This is an outstanding and generous essay. Let not this slight disagreement in anyway disparage the wonderfulness of all the remaining sentences. And maybe I’m wrong. If I am wrong, and we should pity demons, please, some substantive backing up of the claim.
The faith of the Catholic people has utterly and completely collapsed. They don’t go to Mass. They don’t go to confession. They don’t believe in Jesus’ real presence in the Eucharist. They don’t know the Bible. Large majorities reject the Church’s teaching sexual morality. The Devil? Well, Fr. Sosa is just stating what 83% of Catholics already believe, according to CARA. Sad.
What follows is somewhat off the topic. It is well known that there exists no contradiction between faith and reason, and especially not between biblical creation and natural science. According to the latter, the human being came into being from preexistent, living matter, which origined in clay minerals on young Earth, and which was infused with immortal souls, to create our first parents, Adam and Hava. Following Aristotle, then, the human soul has four natural historical layers: dust, created on the first and second days of creation, together with the angels, and the material universe; life, created on the third and fourth days of creation, as was said, origined in clay minerals, and evolved to fungi, plants, and invertebrates, dependent on the light of the Sun, the tides of the Moon, and possibly on cosmic radiation from the Stars, and geological radioactivity; motion and emotion, created on the fifth and sixth days of creation, vertebrates, who were the preexistent, living matter (now extinct great ape species Australopithecus) that God perfected to human beings. Human beings have souls of reason, ordained to the seventh day of creation, as well as human dignity, and unity of person in our immortal souls, even if reason to Aristotle’s standard is not apparent in e.g. children, sick, and poor who have needs. Then, Adam and Hava were instituted in necessary morals, more complex than the morals of any other living species. Even if the Australopithecus was morally more advanced than the still extant great apes, it was not human. Also, human beings have 46 chromosomes in their cell nuclei, while the great apes and the Australopithes have 48, so there was an evolutionary leap and a species barrier. But it is possible to speculate that Adam and Hava spoke with God in their minds, and that God was represented in all creation, and hence, they spoke with the snake, also in their minds. So biblical creation is correct. Also, modern society undervalue human dignity, that is the immortal soul, and much overvalue human reason and intelligence. On a scale, where modern human beings have twelve years of intelligence, our first parents probably had six years of intelligence. Thus, Seth: Homo habilis (7 – 8), Enoch: Homo erectus (9 – 10), and Noah: Homo sapiens (11 – 12), and in fact, they were all capable of music, chess, and religion (of course), since some children aged six years would easily beat me. As regards the Devil, he fell already on the first day, but our first parents obviously fell on the seventh day. In their morals, capable of reason as well as faith, they were in original grace, defined by Augustine: amor Dei usque ad contemptum sui, and were capable of grace with eternal life, which perfects the organism. They were also capable of love, in marriage. They were capable of free will relative to God as well as relative to one another, as persons. But with original sin, which Augustine defines as: amor sui usque ad contemptum Dei, they were no longer capable of eternal life. Aristotle says that all living organisms seek to sexually reproduce, but that there is an hierarchy towards less reproduction and longer lifes, so the human being is godlike, capable of eternal life. Yet, with original sin, its sexuality became disordered, and personal morals were lost. Certainly, the human being was created for God, and not for the violence and promiscuity of the still extant great apes. It is only with the Christian gospel, however, that monogamy and sexual abstinence, respectively, make sense, depending on whether, one as a child of God wishes to marry and beget children or concentrate on eternal life as monk or nun. The pope emeritus has it, when he rejects criticism of his essay on the sexual revolution, by noticing that God is not mentioned on four pages of criticism of the pope emereti essay. Also, the Humanae Vitae assumes the gospel. Unfortunately, the mystery of the human soul, the human person, and human dignity are not easily accessible to modern people, because we have sunk so deeply in sins that we cannot understand what we have not experienced. The Church is one holy, catholic and apostolic, in God the Father, the Son and the Holy Ghost. The Church is also orthodox, with the Holy Virgin Mary. She defeated the Devil by Jesus.
There is a TV show that has been on for several years called Ghost Adventures with Zack Baggans and three other members. They travel to known haunted sites and they use several types of electronic and video equipment to make contact and document verbal and visual evidence of spiritual entities. Occasionally they have a bishop from the American Catholic Church do exorcism of locations or the resident who has some demonic attachment. There are several different shows that do a similar ghost hunt but none of them are nearly as believable or serious about their methods as Zack and his crew. It is interesting but I wouldn’t want to go making contact with disembodied spirits or demonic entities intentionally. The accidental and circumstantial occurrences are difficult enough to handle . I wouldn’t feel in communion in the American Catholic church either. The bishop dresses the part but his assistant “Sister something” wears black leather pants and vest and would look more at home on a motorcycle.
Monsignor, thank you very much. I am having trouble “squaring “ your advice that we should not hate demons with Romans 12:9 in which Paul states that we should “hate what is evil.”
I imagine that Paul could be referencing only evil actions, however, as you noted demons made an eternal decision to be evil and have no chance of redemption.
So, to make this short, as pure spirits that chose evil, I would have thought that it is proper to hate (be repulsed) by demons.
I would greatly appreciate any insight. Thank you again.
I very much appreciate what Msgr. Pope is doing here in refutation of the wayward Jesuit. But I do think we need to be more precise about the love/hate question. I have addressed it here at LifeSite:
Comments are closed.