One of the more difficult biblical themes to understand is the concept of God hardening the hearts and minds of certain human beings. The most memorable case is that of Pharaoh wherein, before sending Moses to him, God said he would “harden Pharaoh’s heart” (Ex 4:21). But there are other instances in which biblical texts speak of God as hardening the hearts of sinners, even from among his own people.

Jesus also hinted at such a theme in the Sunday readings two weeks ago (Matt 13) when He said He spoke in parables (here understood more as “riddles”) in such a way as to affirm that the hearts of most people “outside the house” were hardened. He quotes Isaiah 6:9-10 as He does so. Jesus’ own apostles wondered why He spoke plainly only to them and a close company of disciples, but in riddle-like parables to the crowds outside. In His answer we are left to wonder if Jesus has not perchance written off the crowds and left them in the hardness of their hearts. To be fair, His remark is ambiguous and open to interpretation.

What are we to make of texts like these which explicitly or implicitly speak of God hardening the hearts of people? How can God, who does no evil, be the source of a sinful mind or hard heart? Why would God do such a thing when he has said following elsewhere?

  1. As surely as I live, declares the Sovereign LORD, I take no pleasure in the death of the wicked, but rather that they turn from their ways and live. Turn! Turn from your evil ways! Why will you die, O house of Israel? (Ez 33:11)
  2. God our Savior … wants all men to be saved and to come to a knowledge of the truth (1 Tim 2:4).

To be sure, these questions involve very deep mysteries, mysteries about God’s sovereignty and how it interacts with our freedom, mysteries of time, and mysteries of causality. As a mystery within mysteries, the question of God hardening hearts cannot be resolved simply. Greater minds than mine have pondered these things,  and it would be foolish to think that an easy resolution can be found in a blog post.

But some distinctions can and should be made and some context supplied. We do not want to understand the “hardening texts” in simplistic ways or in ways that use one truth to cancel out other important truths that balance it. So please permit a modest summary of the ancient discussion.

I propose that we examine these sorts of texts along four lines:

  1. The Context of Connivance
  2. The Mystery of Time
  3. The Mystery of Primary Causality
  4. The Necessity of Humility

To begin, it is important simply to list a selection of the hardening texts. The following are not the only ones, but they provide a wide enough sample:

  1. The LORD said to Moses, “When you return to Egypt, see that you perform before Pharaoh all the wonders I have given you the power to do. But I will harden his heart so that he will not let the people go” (Ex 4:21).
  2. Moses and Aaron performed all these wonders before Pharaoh, but the LORD hardened Pharaoh’s heart, and he would not let the Israelites go out of his country (Ex 11:10).
  3. Why, O LORD, do you make us wander from your ways and harden our hearts so we do not revere you? Return for the sake of your servants, the tribes that are your inheritance (Is 63:17).
  4. He [God] has blinded their eyes and deadened their hearts, so they can neither see with their eyes, nor understand with their hearts, nor turn–and I would heal them (Jesus quoting Isaiah 6:9-10, in John 12:40).
  5. They perish because they refused to love the truth and so be saved. For this reason God sends them a powerful delusion so that they will believe the lie (2 Thess 2:11).
  6. Therefore God gave them over in the sinful desires of their hearts to sexual impurity for the degrading of their bodies with one another … Furthermore, since they did not think it worthwhile to retain the knowledge of God, he gave them over to a depraved mind, to do what ought not to be done (Rom 1:24, 28).

Point I. –  THE CONTEXT OF CONNIVANCE – In properly assessing texts like these we ought first consider the contexts in which they were made and written. Generally speaking, most of these declarations that God “hardens the heart” come after a significant period of disobedience on the part of those whose hearts were hardened. In a way, God “cements the deal” and gives them what they really want. For seeing that they have hardened their own hearts to God, He determines that their disposition is to be a permanent one, and in a sovereign exercise of His will (for nothing can happen without God’s allowance), declares and permits their hearts to be hardened in a definitive kind of way. In this sense there is a judgment of God upon the individual that recognizes the person’s definitive decision against Him. Hence this hardening can be understood as voluntary on the part of the one hardened, for God hardens in such a way that He uses the person’s own will for the executing of His judgment. God accepts that the individual’s will against Him is definitive.

A. In the case of Pharaoh, although God indicated to Moses that He would harden Pharaoh’s heart, the actual working out of this is a bit more complicated. We see in the first five plagues that it is Pharaoh who hardens his own heart (Ex 7:13; 7:22; 8:11; 8:28; & 9:7). It is only after this repeated hardening by Pharaoh of his own heart that the Exodus text speaks of God as the one who hardens (Ex 9:12; 9:34; 10:1; 10:20; 10:27). Hence the hardening here is not without Pharaoh’s repeated demonstration of his own hardness. God, if you will, “cements the deal” as a kind of sovereign judgment on Pharaoh.

B. The Isaiah texts (many in number) that speak of a hardening being visited upon Israel by God (e.g., #3 and #4 above),  are  also the culmination of a long testimony by Isaiah of Israel’s hardness. At the beginning of Isaiah’s ministry, God describes (through Isaiah) Israel’s hardness as being of their own doing: For the LORD has spoken: “I reared children and brought them up, but they have rebelled against me. The ox knows his master, the donkey his owner’s manger, but Israel does not know, my people do not understand.” Ah, sinful nation, a people loaded with guilt, a brood of evildoers, children given to corruption! They have forsaken the LORD; they have spurned the Holy One of Israel and turned their backs on him (Is 1:2-4). There follows a long list of their crimes, their hardness, and their refusal to repent.

1. St. John Chrysostom – Of the numerous texts later in Isaiah (and also referenced by Jesus (e.g., Jn 12:40)) that speak of Israel as being hardened by God (and having their eyes shut by Him), St John Chrysostom says, That the saying of Isaiah might be fulfilled: that here is expressive not of the cause, but of the event. They did not disbelieve because Isaiah said they would; but because they would disbelieve, Isaiah said they would … For He does not leave us, except we wish Him … Whereby it is plain that we begin to forsake first, and are the cause of our own perdition. For as it is not the fault of the sun, that it hurts weak eyes, so neither is God to blame for punishing those who do not attend to His words (on a gloss of Is. 6:9-10 at Jn 12:40, quoted in the Catena Aurea).

2. St Augustine also says, This is not said to be the devil’s doing, but God’s. Yet if any ask why they could not believe, I answer, because they would not … But the Prophet, you say, mentions another cause, not their will; but that God had blinded their eyes, and hardened their heart. But I answer, that they well deserved this. For God hardens and blinds a man, by forsaking and not supporting him; and this He makes by a secret sentence, for by an unjust one He cannot (quoted in the Catena Aurea at Jn 12:40).

C. Of the text of 2 ThessaloniansGod sends them a powerful delusion so that they will believe the lie (from #5 above), while the text speaks of God as having sent the delusion, the verses before and after make clear the sinful role of the punished, saying, They perish because they refused to love the truth and so be saved … so that all will be condemned who have not believed the truth but have delighted in wickedness (2 Thess 2:10,12).

1. Of this text St. Augustine says, From a hidden judgment of God comes perversity of heart, so that the refusal to hear the truth leads to the commission of sin, and this sin is itself a punishment for the preceding sin [of refusing to hear the truth] (Against Julian 5.3.12).

2. St John Damascus says, [God does this] so that all may be condemned who did not believe the truth but had pleasure in unrighteousness (The Orthodox Faith 4.26).

D. The texts from Romans 1 speak  of God handing them over only after they have suppressed the truth (1:18), persevered in their wickedness (1:18), and preferred lust and idolatry (1:23-24). Hence, as a just judgment, God hands them over to sexual confusion (homosexuality) and countless other destructive drives. So here, too, though it is said that God hands them over, it is really not that simple. God has, in effect, “cemented the deal.” They do not want to serve Him and so God, knowing their definitive decision, gives them what they want.

E. Thus our first point of distinction in understanding the “hardening” texts is that the context of connivance is important in assessing them. It is not asserted by Scripture that God takes a reasonably righteous man and, out of the blue, hardens his heart, confuses his mind, or causes him (against his will) to become obstinate. The texts are usually presented as a kind of prevenient judgment by God, that the state of the person’s hardness has now become permanent. They refuse and so God “cements the deal” and “causes” them to walk in their own sinful ways since they have insisted on doing so.

Point II.  – THE MYSTERY OF TIME – In understanding these hardening texts (which we have seen are akin to judgment texts) we must strive to recall that God does not live in time in the same way that we do. Scripture speaks often of God’s knowledge and vision of time as being comprehensive rather than speculative or serial (e.g., Ex 3:14; Ps 90:2-4; Ps 93:2; Is 43:13; Ps 139; 2 Peter 3:8; James 1:17).

A. To say that God is eternal and lives in eternity is to say that He lives in the fullness of time. For God, past, present, and future are all the same. God is not wondering what I will do tomorrow, neither is He waiting for it to happen. For Him, my tomorrow has always been present. All of my days were written in His book before one of them ever came to be (Ps 139:16). Whether and how long I live has always been known to Him. Before He ever formed me in my mother’s womb He knew me (Jer 1:4). My final destiny is already known and present to Him.

B. Hence, when we strive to understand God’s judgments in the form of hardening the hearts of certain people, we must be careful not to think He lives in time the way we do. It is not as though God is watching my life like a movie. He already knows the choices I will make. Thus, when God hardens the hearts of some, it is not as though He were merely trying to negatively influence the outcome and trip certain people up. He already knows the outcome and has always known it; He knows the destiny they have chosen.

C. Now be very careful with this insight, for it is a mystery to us. We cannot really know what it is like to live in eternity, in the fullness of time, where the future is just as present as the past. And even if you think you know, you really don’t. What is essential for us to realize is that God does not live in time the way we do. If we try too hard to solve the mystery (rather than merely accept and respect it) we risk falling into the denial of human freedom, or double predestination, or other misguided notions that sacrifice one truth for another rather than holding them in balance. That God knows what I will do tomorrow does not destroy my freedom to actually do it. How this all works out is mysterious. But we are free (Scripture teaches this) and God holds us accountable for our choices. Further, even though God knows my destiny already (and yours as well), this does not mean that He is revealing anything about that to us, so that we should look for signs and seek to call ourselves saved or lost. We ought to work out our salvation in reverential fear and trembling (Phil 2:12).

D. The key point here is mystery. Striving to understand how, why, and when God hardens the heart of anyone is caught up in the mysterious fact that He lives outside of time and knows all things before they happen. Thus He acts with comprehensive knowledge of all outcomes.

Point III. – THE MYSTERY OF CAUSALITY - One of the major differences between the ancient and the modern world is that the ancient world was much more comfortable dealing with something known as primary causality.

A. Up until the Renaissance, God was at the center of all things and people instinctively saw the hand of God in everything, even terrible things. Job of old said, The LORD gave and the LORD has taken away; may the name of the LORD be praised … if we have received good things at the hand of God, why should we not receive evil?” (Job 1:21; 2:10). Thus the ancients would commonly attribute everything as coming from the hand of God, for He was the “first cause” of everything that happened. This is what is meant by primary causality. The ancients were thus much more comfortable attributing things to God, even things that we are not. In speaking like this, they were not engaging in superstitious or primitive thinking, rather they were emphasizing that God was sovereign, omnipotent, and omnipresent and that nothing happened apart from His sovereign will. God is the primary cause of all that is.

1. Of this ancient and scriptural way of thinking the Catechism says, And so we see the Holy Spirit, the principal author of Sacred Scripture, often attributing actions to God without mentioning any secondary causes [e.g., human or natural]. This is not a “primitive mode of speech,” but a profound way of recalling God’s primacy and absolute Lordship over history and the world, and so of educating his people to trust in him (CCC # 304).

2. The key point here is understanding that the ancient biblical texts, while often speaking of God as hardening the hearts of sinners, did not mean to say that man had no role, no responsibility. Neither did the texts mean to say that God acted in a merely arbitrary way. Rather, the emphasis was on God’s sovereign power as the first cause of all that is. Hence He is often called the cause of all things and His hand is seen in everything.  As we shall see, we moderns are uncomfortable in speaking this way.

B. After the Renaissance, man moved himself to the center and God was gradually “escorted” to the periphery. Thus man’s manner of thinking and speaking began to shift to secondary causes (causes related to man and nature). If something happens we look to natural causes, or in human situations, to the humans who caused it. These are secondary causes, however, since I cannot cause something to happen unless God causes me. Yet increasingly the modern mind struggles to maintain a balance between the two mysteries: our freedom and responsibility, and God’s sovereignty and omnipotence.

C. In effect we have largely thrown primary causality overboard as a category. Even modern believers unconsciously do this and thus exhibit three related issues:

1. We fail to maintain the proper balance between two mysteries: God’s sovereignty and our freedom.

2. We exhibit shock at things like the “hardening texts” of the Bible because we understand them poorly.

3. We try to resolve the shock by favoring one truth over the other. Maybe we just brush aside the ancient biblical texts as a “primitive mode of speech” and say, inappropriately, “God didn’t have anything to do with this or that.” Or we go to the other extreme and become fatalistic, denying human freedom, denying secondary causality (our part),  and accusing God of everything (as if He were the only cause and had the sole blame for everything). We either read the hardening texts with a clumsy literalism or we dismiss them as misguided notions from an immature, primitive, and pre-scientific age.

D. The point here is that we have to balance the mysteries of primary and secondary causality. We cannot fully understand how they interrelate, but they do. Both mysteries need to be held. The ancients were more sophisticated in holding these mysteries in the proper balance. We are not. We handle causality very clumsily and do not appreciate the distinctions of primary causality (God’s part) and secondary causality (our own and nature’s part). We try to resolve the mystery rather than holding it in balance and speaking to both realities. As such, we are poor interpreters of the “hardening texts.”

Point IV. – THE NECESSITY OF HUMILITY - By now it will be seen that we are dealing with a mysterious interrelationship of God and Man, between God’s sovereignty and our freedom, between primary and secondary causality. In the face of such mysteries we have to be very humble. We ought not think more of the details than is proper for us, for, frankly, they are largely hidden from us. Too many moderns either dismiss the hardening texts or accept them and then sit in harsh judgment over God (as if we could do such a thing). Neither approach bespeaks humility. Consider a shocking but very humbling text in which Paul warns us in this very matter:

What then shall we say? Is God unjust? Not at all!  For he says to Moses, “I will have mercy on whom I have mercy, and I will have compassion on whom I have compassion.” It does not, therefore, depend on man’s desire or effort, but on God’s mercy. For the Scripture says to Pharaoh: “I raised you up for this very purpose, that I might display my power in you and that my name might be proclaimed in all the earth.” Therefore God has mercy on whom he wants to have mercy, and he hardens whom he wants to harden. One of you will say to me: “Then why does God still blame us? For who resists his will?” But who are you, O man, to talk back to God? “Shall what is formed say to him who formed it, ‘Why did you make me like this?’” (Romans 9:14-20)

None of us can demand an absolute account of God for what He does. Even if He were to tell us, could our small and worldly minds ever really comprehend it? My thoughts are not your thoughts, and my ways are not your ways, says the Lord (Is 55:8).

Summary – In this (rather too long) post, we have considered the “hardening texts” in which it seems that God hardens the hearts of certain people and groups. And so He does. But texts like these must be approached carefully, humbly, and with proper distinctions as to the scriptural and historical context. At work here are profound mysteries: God’s sovereignty, our freedom, His mercy, and His justice.

We should be careful to admit the limits of our knowledge when it comes to such texts. As the Catechism so beautifully states, when it comes to texts like these they are to be appreciated as a profound way of recalling God’s primacy and absolute Lordship over history and the world, and so of educating his people to trust in him (CCC # 304).

This song says, “Be not angry any longer Lord and no more remember our iniquities. Behold and regard us; we are all your people!”

23 Responses

  1. Jas says:

    I thank God for the gift of words He has given you, for you write as one like me can understand. Thanks (not long, comprehensive and needed) for these points to ponder. And thanks for helping me better understand modern thinking, too. Is it safe to say, for us, looking back the deal was bonded but for all here living there’s always hope? I thought of Ezekiel 18. “For I find no pleasure in the death of anyone who dies—oracle of the Lord GOD. Turn back and live!”
    Wonderful posts… God bless!

  2. R in Indiana says:

    Thank you for addressing this issue. The hardening texts have troubled me, and it is easy to simply throw up my hands and say it is a mystery, but that is an only a half-hearted response. It is good to ponder Biblical texts especially with an experienced guide like you to enlighten us.

  3. C Beltz says:

    I used to become upset at the hardening texts. That is before I read this article. Now I get that His hardening of hearts is not random or arbitrary. It is cause and effect.

    I get the primary causality in that He created each of us as unique and special beings. He put into us those qualities that make our hearts hard or weak and gave us lives in which we have the freedom to make choices that will move us in either direction.

    I get the secondary causality in that our pride and human weakness lends itself toward that hardness. That many of us have a “natural” inclination to perceive mastery over our lives and from that look to a god we can master as well. When faced with a god Who is in fact much greater than our puny human selves, we harden our hearts in denial of the truth.

    Thank God for humility. Praise God for His goodness. I am forever blessed by His providence and mercy.

    Thank you Msgr for yet another great post. I needed this one more than you know.

  4. Robertlifelongcatholic says:

    More often God hardens our arteries before having to take it to heart if that is any consolation.So, sailing into the mystic, the further I attempt to go, the more behind I seem to get, not realizing I have already arrived at where I was meant to be..

  5. I Like The Church Fathers says:

    “The ancients were thus much more comfortable attributing things to God, even things that we are not. In speaking like this, they were not engaging in superstitious or primitive thinking….”

    Were they not?

    An example of earlier peoples attributing things to God is the practice of trial by ordeal in Medieval Europe. The practice was widespread throughout the Middle Ages and only started to disappear in the Renaissance.

    In trial by ordeal, your fate was, in theory at least, in God’s hands. If you survived the fire or boiling water, your innocence was deemed to have been proven miraculously by God. If you did not, then you were obviously guilty because God had abandoned you.

    I suppose some people even today would prefer to have a legal system where your fate depends directly on a decision by God. There is no doubt, however, that such a system is far more primitive than the complex system we have today.

  6. NinaBG says:

    Another wonderful post!!! Thank you for your clarity. You are a great teacher.

  7. Maria says:

    This is an excellent post and I’ve really struggled to understand these texts. Thanks Monsignor. I only wish that Holy Mother Church would offer a really good contemporary Scriptural commentary. The notes in the NAB are all historical-critical and not theological at all. Conversely, the notes in the Navarre are all theological. Is there no via media?

  8. Christopher Smith says:

    A wonderful writing on a much needed topic for today. It brings together God’s will that man be eternally happy with him, and God’s will that man be created with free will. Since, if God were to make everything good for all good people, he would take away part of the effects of free will. Bad things happen to good people not because God wills them to happen (as if God were to will something bad to happen intentionally), but because men have sinned against God and used their free will incorrectly. So, it is not God’s will that someone innocent be harmed, but it is God’s will that man have free will (which can cause someone to be harmed).

    An excellent post, and one that fits in well with thoughts that my graduate courses in theology have had me contemplating for quite a while.

  9. Lynette says:

    Thank you so much. I have been pondering this term, “hardness of heart” and this column has helped. The term C.S. Lewis used in the Trilogy, “bent” comes to mind. We become bent by our own actions, then the subsequent actions become (almost) impossible to do with integrity, perhaps.

  10. TeaPot562 says:

    Monsignor Pope,
    In most cases, we humans set patterns for our behavior: between obedience and disobedience, between kindness to others and cruelty, between greed and awareness of the needs of others, etc.
    Your discussion of the scriptural “hardness of heart” passages seems quite helpful to me in understanding and explaining it to others if the occasion arises. Since some of my grandkids have stopped attending Mass on any regular basis, I anticipate that some occasion or other will arise.
    God’s mercy is another quality that one does not comprehend. Consider St. Dismas – Luke 23: 40-43. The Romans might identify as “thieves” any rebels who tried to steal Roman weapons, so Dismas may have been a Jewish rebel, rather than (strictly speaking) a “thief”. Why does God send the grace of repentance to him?
    The same question may be asked about other habitual or notorious sinners.
    When a doctor who has committed many abortions repents, Why has grace been provided? To our human knowledge, the observation of a “final repentance” on the part of someone in the notorious sinner category always seems incredible; but it seems to be an exception rather than the rule. Do not adopt a habit of serious sin on the basis that you will be given a grace of a deathbed repentance and steal heaven. Many years ago, that attitude was called “Presumption”, Passengers on planes such as the plane shot down over the Ukraine would have had little knowledge of their impending deaths, and perhaps only seconds to repent after the plane exploded.
    Again, thank you for your explanation and discussion.
    TeaPot562

  11. Repent and Believe the Gospel! says:

    Perhaps “hardening the hearts” means withholding graces because the sinner is unrepentant.
    The writings of the Old Testament authors are sometimes unclear (perhaps the theology was developing) and the sacred writers were grasping for the correct words.

  12. bobster says:

    I am reminded of Aquinas’s explanation of God’s antecedent and consequent wills

  13. Dick says:

    Thanks for this explanation. The text’s that are throwing me for a loop right now are the one’s that talk about God repenting from doing evil. Are these concepts related?
    Dick

  14. MikefromED says:

    My edition of the Douay-Rheims Bible has notes compiled by Bishop Challoner (1691-1781). With regard to Ex. 4:21 the note says, “Not by being the efficient cause of his sin; but by withdrawing from him, for his just punishment, the dew of grace that might have softened his heart; and so suffering him to grow harder and harder.”
    Incidentally, does this verse not come before the ones referred to in the following sentence and therefore contradict the ‘after’?
    “It is only after this repeated hardening by Pharaoh of his own heart that the Exodus text speaks of God as the one who hardens (Ex 9:12; 9:34; 10:1; 10:20; 10:27).”

  15. Sam says:

    God chooses some and not others. And God’s choice is not based upon any foreseen merit or demerit on the part of the soul. St. Thomas explains that God wills to manifest both His Justice and His Mercy in creation. He manifests His Mercy in the elect, like He manifests his Jusitce in the reprobate. Garigou-Lagrange states that the whole mystery of Grace and Predestination is virtually contained in this truth: God is the cause of all good things. Hence, if someone does a good act, it’s because God causes that person to do the good. Then it follows, does it not?, that if someone does not do a good act, it is because God does not cause that person to do it. I’m not denying free will. However, as you stated, it is a total mystery! There is no way of even approaching an understanding of the interplay between God’s will and ours. Neither can we question why God chooses some for Mercy and does not choose others. It is completely arbitrary–in the sense that it is completely up to God’s will. I reiterate–there is no way to grasp these mysteries! I just hope that I am one of the chosen ones!

  16. Sam says:

    And in response to the quotations about GOd willing the salvation of all men–St Thomas explains that there are 2 aspects of God’s will: the consequent and the antecedent. In His antecedent will, He wills the salvation of every individual. But in His consequent will, which is what He actually wills, He only wills the salvation of the elect.

  17. Sam says:

    Attempting to grapple with these issues should only make us humbler and more dependent upon God, realizing more and more that without Him we really can do nothing good. Additionally, the good we do we will recognize more clearly that it is from Him therefor we will avoid taking pride in it.

  18. Tom says:

    Thank you for this post, Msgr Pope. Well done!

  19. Jake1820 says:

    This really echos in more detail what Bishop Challoner said in the Douay-Rheims footnote for Exodus 4:21 “I shall harden: Not by being the efficient cause of his sin; but by withdrawing from him, for his just punishment, the dew of grace that might have softened his heart; and so suffering him to grow harder and harder.”

  20. Eileen says:

    Msgr. thank you very much for explaining this so clearly and briefly! I have also struggled with it as everybody does, but possibly from a reverse perspective. I ‘assumed’ that most believers understood the principal that “Nothing is outside the will of God”. Oh my! I got quite a tongue-lashing from a very dear Christian (non-Catholic) friend when I said those very words. I was not only surprised, but realized that there was no way to even discuss this because it was such an emotional and almost dogmatic belief of hers, and that I was bordering on blasphemy. I was shut down completely and intentionally. My favorite bible passage is Romans 8:28 and I refer to it often – even in bad times. This is what my friend objected to. She was furious with me that, “Just because you can see a silver lining in this tragedy does not mean that God willed it.” I naively replied, “But nothing is outside the will of God.” That is when she became irate and wanted to silence me, as if I were speaking blasphemy in her presence, by saying, “There you go, you said it AGAIN!” I was very confused and realized that this was not leading to a good solution and calmly became quite.

    So I went back to some of my favorite “resources” on the topic. The main ‘rock’ is my own dad. He has a very childlike but mature faith. My two favorite books on this are: Trustful Surrender to Divine Providence by Fr. Jean Baptiste, St. Jure, S.J. & Saint Claude de la Colombiere, S.J. and Abandonment to Divine Providence by Fr. Jean-Pierre de Caussade, S.J. And now YOU, dear Msgr. have also reconfirmed this for me. For quite some time, I was confused and afraid to speak in these terms out loud, even to Catholics. Thank you for “confirming the brethren”!

  21. Jas says:

    Oh, so this makes sense in regards to Point 1 above…
    “So I thrust them away to the hardness of their heart;
    ‘Let them walk in their own machinations.’” (Ps.81:13) vs. 14 made me think of our Lord’s lament in Luke 13:34… much to pray in this chapter. Back to Psalm 81 (16) “Those who hate the LORD will try flattering him, but their fate is fixed forever.” Is this related to (Lk 13:24) “Strive to enter through the narrow door, for many, I tell you, will attempt to enter but will not be strong enough” in that these rely on their own ‘strength’ instead of the Lord? Is this so?
    Good evening and God bless!

Leave a Reply