Mary Magdalene’s Journey out of Fear to Easter Faith


As I have commented before, all the resurrection stories depict the Apostles and other disciples on a “journey” of sorts to understand the resurrection. A completely new reality was breaking into their world and challenging their understanding. Far from depicting the disciples as credulous, the texts describe them as shocked, troubled, and even quite dubious. These were not men and women prone to naiveté and concocting stories to assuage their grief. These are stories of men and women who are quite stunned by a new reality and struggling to get their minds around something they do not fully understand.

A beautiful example of a journey to resurrection faith is that of Mary Magdalene, who begins her journey on resurrection with the intention of finalizing burial rituals for the corpse of Jesus, and ends by acknowledging that she has seen “the Lord.” Let’s examine her journey and see what it has to teach us about our own.

The Passage in question is John 20. By way of background, recall that Mary had gone to the tomb very early, “when it was still dark,” and found the stone rolled back and the tomb empty. She ran and got Peter and John who then investigated, and (though John believed) there was no conclusion announced after their investigation. They leave and Mary Magdalene is left at the tomb by herself, at least temporarily (for we know from other Gospels that other women were near at hand). Here is where the text picks up:

Then the disciples went back to their homes. But Mary stood weeping outside the tomb, and as she wept she stooped to look into the tomb; and she saw two angels in white, sitting where the body of Jesus had lain, one at the head and one at the feet. They said to her, “Woman, why are you weeping?” She said to them, “Because they have taken away my Lord, and I do not know where they have laid him.” Saying this, she turned round and saw Jesus standing, but she did not know that it was Jesus. Jesus said to her, “Woman, why are you weeping? Whom do you seek?” Supposing him to be the gardener, she said to him, “Sir, if you have carried him away, tell me where you have laid him, and I will take him away.” Jesus said to her, “Mary.” She turned and said to him in Hebrew, “Rabboni!” (which means Teacher). Jesus said to her, “Do not hold me, for I have not yet ascended to the Father; but go to my brethren and say to them, I am ascending to my Father and your Father, to my God and your God.” Mary Magdalene went and said to the disciples, “I have seen the Lord”; and she told them that he had said these things to her. (John 20:10-18)

Mary Magdalene makes a journey in this passage from fear to faith. Here is a very general outline of the passage:

  • I. Fearful Fretting – vv. 10-13
    • Rhetorical Question – “Why are you Weeping?”
    • Rueful Response
  • II.Faulty Finding – vv. 14-15
  • III. First Faith –
  • IV. Flamboyant Felicity – vv. 16-17
    • (1) Status quo ante – v. 16
    • (2) Summons – v. 17
  • V. Fullness of Faith – v. 18

I. Fearful Fretting – Mary Magdalene is looking for a corpse. She’d come out to the tomb that morning for one purpose: to finish the prescribed burial customs for Jesus. His body had been placed in the tomb hurriedly on Friday evening, for it was almost sundown and the Passover feast was near. Now the Passover and Sabbath were complete; it was time to anoint the body and finish all the usual customs.

On Friday, she had been through immense trauma, seeing her beloved Jesus, her Messiah, brutally tortured and slowly killed through crucifixion. It seemed as if things could not possibly get worse, yet they just did. It would appear, according to her, that grave robbers had now broken in and stolen the body. Strangely, they had left the expensive linens behind. But never mind that, things had now gone from complete disaster, to total disaster. Now it would seem that she could not even perform a final kindness for Jesus.

And yet, because of her fearful fretting, Mary is not able to look at the information before her properly. Jesus had promised to rise from the dead, on the third day, and this was the third day. The empty tomb does not signify grave robbers; it manifests resurrection! But in her fear and fretful grief, Mary draws only the most negative of conclusions.

And this of course is our human condition. So many of us, on account of fear, and perhaps past trauma, tend to place the most negative interpretations upon our daily life. We are quick to seize on bad news, and we dismiss good news too easily, or barely notice that every day most things go right. Instead, we focus on the few things that go wrong. Yes, so easily we are negative and forget that even in painful transitions, as certain doors close, others open. New possibilities often emerge even in painful circumstances.

Mary is about to encounter something astonishingly new. But for now, her grief has locked her into only the most negative of interpretations.

A. Rhetorical Question – There comes to her, from the angels, a kind of rhetorical question: “Why do you weep?” A rhetorical question is really more of a statement in the form of a question. It is meant to provoke thought, and to rebuke or at least to invite reconsideration. The Angels, it would seem, are inviting her to recall that this is the third day, and Jesus promised to rise. Therefore, why would she weep over an empty tomb? Jesus, who had raised others from the dead, cast out blindness, calmed storms, and healed lepers, had said he would rise on the third day. Why weep over an empty tomb? Rather, she should rejoice!

B. Rueful Response – But Mary will have none of it, and her grief she does not take up the consideration offered her by the angels. She states flatly, ‘I’m looking for a corpse that they’ve taken away. Tell me where you put this corpse so I can continue to go to work.’

Grief does that. It takes away our capacity to see more clearly other possibilities, other interpretations. So easily we catastrophize; we assume the worst. Mary is at her lowest, locked into fearful fretting and colossal grief.

II. Faulty Finding The text says, she turned around and saw Jesus there, but did not know it was Jesus. Jesus speaks to her, Woman why are you weeping? Whom are you looking for?  But she thought it was the gardener, and goes on speaking of Jesus as a corpse she is looking for.

Why does she not recognize him? Has he changed his appearance? Or perhaps there were tears in her eyes, and she could not see well. We cannot say; but either way, she’s looking right at Jesus, but does not recognize him.

But too often, this is our condition as well. The Lord is more present to us than we are to ourselves; he is more present than anyone or anything in this world. And yet we see everyone and everything except him. This is our spiritual blindness. We must make a journey in faith, and learn to see him. We must come to the normal Christian life, which is to be in living, conscious contact with Jesus at every moment of the day. Does the sun cease to be present simply because the blind man cannot see it? Of course not. And neither does the Lord cease to be present to us simply because we cannot see him. We must make the journey of faith wherein our eyes are opened, the eyes of our faith to see God’s presence everywhere.

III. First Faith – One of the paradoxes of our faith is that we learn to see by hearing. For Scripture says, faith comes by hearing (Rom 10:17). And faith is a way of knowing, and a way of seeing by way of that knowledge.

Thus, Jesus speaks and says “Mary.” And with this word, her faith is enlivened; her eyes are opened and she sees Jesus.

And so it is that we too must allow the Lord to speak to us through his Word, so we can learn to know him and to see him by faith, not by fleshly sight, but by faith.

But Mary’s faith is only a first faith, an initial faith. It needs maturing, as we shall see in the next point.

IV. Flamboyant Felicity – Mary’s initial reaction, having come to recognize the Lord Jesus, is to smother him, to cling to him. Her excess is not merely physical, but bespeaks a kind of clinging to the past. And while it is true that the actual body of Jesus is risen and restored to her, the humanity that has been raised is also a glorified humanity. There is something new that Mary must step back and behold.

A. Status quo ante – Thus Jesus says to her: Do not hold me, that is, “do not cling to me.” Mary’s gesture of embracing the Lord, and his reaction to it, suggest that something has changed that Mary has not yet fully understood. She clings to him as he was. As if to say, “Jesus it’s you! Let’s take up where we were before the crucifixion.” She thinks of Jesus of Nazareth alive again, but she must now also see the Lord of glory. His crucifixion has led now to His glory. That is why Jesus speaks further of the fact that he is ascending to the Father.

We too must lay hold of a deeper understanding of Jesus as we make our journey. Or to put it in Jesus’ terms, we must let the Lord “ascend” in our own estimation. Scripture says elsewhere:

From now on, therefore, we regard no one from a human point of view; even though we once regarded Christ from a human point of view, we regard him thus no longer. Therefore, if any one is in Christ, he is a new creation; the old has passed away, behold, the new has come.All this is from God, who through Christ reconciled us to himself and gave us the ministry of reconciliation; that is, in Christ God was reconciling the world to himself, not counting their trespasses against them, and entrusting to us the message of reconciliation. (2 Cor 5:16-20 )

B. Summons – Mary is then given a summons wherein Jesus says to her: Go to my brethren. Note that this is the first time that he ever called the apostles “brethren.” It seems it took the passion, death, and resurrection to accomplish this in fact. Scripture says elsewhere,

  1. I will tell of thy name to my brethren; in the midst of the congregation I will praise thee: You who fear the LORD, praise him! all you sons of Jacob, glorify him, and stand in awe of him, all you sons of Israel! (Psalm 22:22-23)
  2. For those whom he foreknew he also predestined to be conformed to the image of his Son, in order that he might be the first-born among many brethren. (Romans 8:29)
  3. For it was fitting that he, for whom and by whom all things exist, in bringing many sons to glory, should make the pioneer of their salvation perfect through suffering. For he who sanctifies and those who are sanctified have all one origin. That is why he is not ashamed to call them brethren, saying, “I will proclaim thy name to my brethren, in the midst of the congregation I will praise thee.” And again, “I will put my trust in him.” And again, “Here am I, and the children God has given me.” (Heb 2:101-3)

Mary is further told that she should say to them, I am ascending to my Father and your Father, to My God and your God.

It is interesting that He did not tell Mary to inform them that he had risen, but rather that he was ascending. His purpose was not to stress that he had died and was now alive but that he was glorified and that this was the beginning of a whole new spiritual kingdom where he was to reign with the Father.

Note too that Jesus never said “Our Father” as if the relation that He had to the Father was on the same plane as ours. Jesus’ sonship was by nature, ours is by adoption and membership in the Body of Christ.

Mary and we are also taught another important distinction. In terms of his human nature, Christ can say, “My God.” He chooses to emphasize his human nature here because it is that nature that has risen and is now glorified and changed. As God, he could not suffer or ascend. But as man he can do both and ascend, as Man, to “his God” In terms of his Divine nature the phrase “My God” makes little sense. But Scripture often speaks of Jesus in view of one nature or the other and the result is that the language is affected.

V. Fullness of Faith – Mary makes a remarkable journey. She comes to a fuller faith based on this interaction with the Risen Jesus. How? She says, I have seen the Lord. Mary’s declaration shows that she has already made progress in understanding the new relationship she has with the risen Jesus. She does not say, “I have seen Jesus.” She calls him the Lord. This is resurrection faith: to see the glory of Jesus and understand that he is the Lord of glory and the Word who is God.

Here is true Easter faith: not merely to see a corpse come back to life, but also to be able to see who he really is: “The Lord.” Jesus is Lord, and he is risen from the dead. Scripture says elsewhere,

Phil 2: 5 Christ Jesus, who, though he was in the form of God, did not count equality with God a thing to be grasped, but emptied himself, taking the form of a servant, being born in the likeness of men. And being found in human form he humbled himself and became obedient unto death, even death on a cross. Therefore God has highly exalted him and bestowed on him the name which is above every name, that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth,  and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.

Mary Magdalene has made a journey from fear to faith. She began by looking for a corpse to anoint. She ends by making the mature Easter declaration: “I have seen the Lord.” It is truly Jesus who is risen in the self-same body. But he is glorified, and now shows forth fully the refulgence of his glory as the eternal Son of God and Son of Man. To come to Easter faith is not only to see Jesus of Nazareth raised from the dead, but even more so to behold that he is the Lord of Glory.

Mary has made the journey. How about you?

8 Replies to “Mary Magdalene’s Journey out of Fear to Easter Faith”

  1. In II. Faulty Finding “Does the sun cease to be present simply because the blind man cannot see it?”
    So, I will presume to suggest another comparison. When I was a young child I would sometimes look at the moon and see a great circle, at others a half circle and, later still, at a mere crescent.
    Then I was told of how the shadow of the earth was cast upon the moon, and how that shadow caused that which is called phases. Sometime later, upon looking at the moon in one of its partial phases, there it was, the entire moon with the light on what was called a half moon or a crescent moon. Also, there was the rest of the outer circle and the shadow over the part which had appeared to be missing.
    I was not blind yet, I did not see until being told what to look for. I did not, however, see until it was explained and; time had passed. A few days, a few weeks, at most a few months? Don’t recall exactly because it was a long time ago in the context of my life. However, it did take a while for me to let go of pre-conceived notions in order to display what had always been there for me to look at.
    I claim to have faith but, how great is that faith? If it was like the tiny mustard seed then I could order a mountain to move to the sea and it would. Tried it and it hadn’t. didn’t really want it to do so. Faith should be an expression of love and not a disruptive form of egotism. Indeed the egotism is an illusion of faith hidden in the darkness out of a fear of light – just as the dark parts of the moon were (partially) hidden until I truly looked.
    Imagine if the mountain had moved – thereby disrupting the community in which I live. Where’s the love as I leap around and boast about MY alleged power while local shipping struggles around the mountain instead of sailing straight in to port as before?
    If someone abuses me and I develop a dislike for them, which sabotages love, how can I be at fault? They did a mis-deed didn’t they? Have I forgiven them because they have a worthiness? If so, well done. Have I forgiven the mis-deed as if it was worthy of respect? Forgiving someone who is still early in overcoming pre-conceived notions is, in my belief, ok. Forgiving them after they continue to cause the same havoc, or worse, after many chances to overcome pre-conceived notions, is still necessary but, I feel that I must state that the mis-deed is totally unacceptable or else I become an enabler.
    Newcomers to addiction recovery are regularly forgiven much because they have been lured away from a destructive false comfort which is the closest they can come to experiencing comfort. If, however, they contine to be, or to act, destructively confused it appears necessary that I stop enabling and forgive with accountability for the misdeed.
    Twelve Steps include #9 to make amends about the deeds of my sick past and #10 to promptly admit that I am wrong. Is admission saying I’m sorry without sincerity so that I can do it again? I don’t think so. If I enable people to do so then the sin is not just theirs but also mine.
    I see that I’ve drifted off topic but will leave it and see whether consequences feel nice, feel unpleasant or some of each. Perhaps the unpleasant will be the most beneficial.

      1. I can address a couple points here.

        Forgiveness is a gift you give yourself. It releases you (and only you) from the burden of the pain caused by the sin. The object of that forgiveness (ie, the sinner) cannot receive that forgiveness without actually seeking it out. You can forgive a person 1000 times for the same offense but until that person actively and knowingly seeks forgiveness, they are still held captive by the evil. You, on the other hand, are not. Do you see the difference?

        While you may develop a dislike for a person based on how they treat you, your choice to forgive, love, be kind still defines only you. Likewise, your choice to avoid, criticize, or be angry toward the same person does the same. Do you choose to difine yourself by good or evil?

        I think Pope Francis said you can love the sinner but not the sin. You make a choice to steal for what ever reason (maybe you’re really hungry). Are you evil? No. Is stealing evil? Yes. See the difference?

        Enabling a sinner is not done by forgiveness. Giving an alcoholic a drink is enabling. Forgiving them for having unhealthy coping mechanisms is not. If you are having trouble distinguishing between the two, you should research boundary setting. Healthy detachment from a person’s propensity to sin (addiction, in this case) will go a long way toward helping you reap the benefits of forgiveness.

        1. Thanks for that. Your mention of loving the sinner but not the sin reminds me of how I first heard it from Anita Bryant a few decades ago when she spoke out against homosexual activity but, included God’s love of the sinner.
          She lost her advertising contract with an orange (juice?) company because of it but, seemed to accept the sacrifice and prayed, at her husbands suggestion, for a person who threw a pie in her face – even as the pie was dripping off.

  2. “These are stories of men and women who are quite stunned by a new reality and struggling to get their minds around something they do not fully understand”

    We should keep this in mind for ourselves. We, too, cannot fully understand the new reality. If we could understand it fully with our minds, there would be no need for faith. We have to accept the reality of the new life with a sense of mystery, wonder, and, at times, doubt.

  3. The store of mary magdalenes is really awesome and i like it very much. Thanks for sharing

  4. Before, I was almost always afraid of anything that may seem affecting me or my family, though only in the virtual imagination of my mind. Now, I see a reality that opened my mind and heart that whatever might happen in my life either controllable or uncontrollable, GOD, HIMSELF is in control and holds our future in HIS Mighty Hands. I might still be concerned but I know ‘all things will work for the good of those who love HIM and those called for HIS Purpose,’ not little things, not some things, not most things but all things. Well, GOD who is bigger than the universe wrote my name, your name in the palms of HIS Hand so HE will not forget me and neither HE you. Thank you, Monsignor for this profound article.

Comments are closed.