Here in Holy Week we ponder the events that led to Jesus’ death and resurrection. Among the things to ponder is a dramatic moment in the trial before Pilate when the people who were present  utter a curse upon themselves. We read of it in Matthew’s Gospel:

When Pilate saw that he was getting nowhere, but that instead an uproar was starting, he took water and washed his hands in front of the crowd. “I am innocent of this man’s blood,” he said. “It is your responsibility!” And all the people answered, “His blood be on us and on our children!” (Matt 27:24-25).

Now of course the people did not intend or think of it as a curse since they were convinced of their righteousness in the matter. Nevertheless, a curse of this sort becomes operative if they do in fact act unrighteously, which they do. Hence we have here a self-imposed curse.

Some care is necessary not to associate this curse merely with the Jewish people. In the past some have used this passage to assert that the Jewish people have suffered rightly for what “they” did to Christ. But of course the Jewish people were divided over Christ. Many followed Jesus and accepted him as Messiah. All the first converts were Jews. Other Jews rejected Jesus. So, which group speaks for “the Jews” and which has the power to bring a curse upon the Jewish people? It seems untenable that a small group of Jews would be able to cause all Jews to be thus cursed.

A better and more personal understanding of the text is that the group represents not the Jewish people per se, but the whole of humanity. For, truth be told, we have all crucified Christ. It is something WE did, not merely some vague group of others called “they.” And this self imposed curse: His blood be on us and on our children!, is something we have all somehow said, we are collectively guilty of the blood of Christ.

So we are cursed! Or are we? Consider the following passage written by the Pope in his recent book, Jesus of Nazareth (Vol 2)

When in Matthew’s account the “whole people” say: “His blood be on us and on our children” (27:25), the Christian will remember that Jesus’ blood speaks a different language from the blood of Abel (Heb 12:24): it does not cry out for vengeance and punishment; it brings reconciliation. It is not poured out against anyone; it is poured out for many, for all. “All have sinned and fall short of the glory of God. . . God put [Jesus] forward as an expiation by his blood” (Rom 3:23, 25). Just as Caiaphas’ words about the need for Jesus’ death have to be read in an entirely new light from the perspective of faith, the same applies to Matthew’s reference to blood: read in the light of faith, it means that we all stand in need of the purifying power of love which is his blood. These words are not a curse, but rather redemption, salvation. Only when understood in terms of the theology of the Last Supper and the Cross, drawn from the whole of the New Testament, does this verse from Matthew’s Gospel take on its correct meaning. (Jesus of Nazareth P. 187 )

So the intended curse becomes a blessing! As the people (i.e., we) say His Blood be upon us and on our children one can almost hear God say:

You don’t know how right you are! For unless my Son’s blood be upon you, you have no hope. Only if his blood be upon you and your children will you ever be healed and saved. You mean these words for a curse, but I mean them for a blessing! Yes! His blood be upon you! Amen, so be it.

And thus God writes straight with crooked lines. He makes a way out of no way and when we curse, he returns a blessing instead.

This of course is not the only time that God has so acted to bring blessings out of things where curses are really deserved.

1. The most obvious parallel is the story of Joseph in the Old Testament. Joseph’s brothers acted wickedly in staging his death and selling him into slavery. But that very act led to their salvation from famine. For having been sold downstream Joseph end up in Pharaoh’s household and becomes Prime Minister of Egypt. Interpreting Pharaoh’s dream to mean a coming famine after a time of plenty he orders surplus food  to be stored. This saves not only Egypt, but also surrounding lands, to include Canaan. Joseph’s brothers and their families are saved by the very man they sold downstream. Realizing this they fell at his feet prepared to become his slaves. But Joseph said to them regarding their wicked act: As for you, you meant evil against me, but God meant it for good, to bring it about that many people should be kept alive, as they are today. (Gen 50:20). And so Joseph was a type (or prefigurement) of Christ. God can write straight with crooked lines and make a way out of no way.

2. Another example from scripture illustrates how, although we may mean one thing by our words, God means another. It is in John Gospel where the High Priest declares that Jesus must die. Note in this passage how he says one thing, but God means another:

But some of them went to the Pharisees, and told them the things that Jesus had done.  The chief priests therefore, and the Pharisees, gathered a council, and said: What do we, for this man does  many miracles? If we let him alone, all will believe in him; and the Romans will come, and take away our place and nation.  But one of them, named Caiphas, being the high priest that year, said to them: You know nothing.  Neither do you consider that it is expedient for you that one man should die for the people, and that the whole nation perish not.  And this he spoke not of himself: but being the high priest of that year, he prophesied that Jesus should die for the nation.  And not only for the nation, but to gather together in one the children of God, that were dispersed. (John 11:46-52)

Yes, indeed, when Caiphas spoke of it being better for Jesus to die than the whole nation perish, he meant it as a death sentence on Jesus, but God meant it for salvation. That Jesus should die rather than all of us be lost, never a truer word was spoken! Caiphas meant it for ill but God meant it for good. Yet again, God writes straight with crooked lines, he makes a way out of no way.

So consider well the curse that turned out to be a blessing: His blood be on us and on our children! Never a truer word was spoken. And by it we are saved.

Photo above from The Passion of the Christ

This song says, What can wash away my sin? Nothing but the Blood of Jesus. What can make me whole again? Nothing but the blood of Jesus

8 Responses

  1. Nick says:

    The Apostles taught that the Jews crucified Our Lord, yet those who sin crucify Him again. (Acts 2:36, Hebrews 6:6)

  2. Esther says:

    Msgr, I thoght what you wrote was interesting and then when you hads to show the Hillsong video- I was really disappointingly surprised it could be used to promote your writing.Surely, there were better examples than theirs!

    • Hmm…. is there something wrong with the group that I am not aware of? I don’t really know anything about them except that they do a lot of Christian Contemporary music. Is their another song you would have preferred? I use a wide variety of music on this blog from Chant to polyphony, from classical to contemporary.

  3. susan says:

    Monsignor, this has been an amazing relevation to me about the Jews, that the curse was actually a blessing. I thank you.

    Blood of Christ, price of our salvation, save us.

  4. suzanne says:

    No clue what’s wrong w/ Hillsong…i LOVE their music! As a convert I am so grateful for my Protestant heritage, music-wise! There is SO much great music that is theologically sound and I think that most Catholics are ‘snooty’ when it comes to music! :D

    • suzanne says:

      Also…I’ll never forget (and I think I was about 8, so it stuck w/ me!) when I heard Nothing But the Blood sung as a question and answer duet…it was powerful. One person asked the questions…”What can wash away my sin??” and the other person kept singing “Nothing but the blood of Jesus!”

  5. Peter Wolczuk says:

    Washed in the blood of the Lamb indeed! I ask myself how I could have missed such a simple thing as I struggled with the powerful anti – Semitism of the enclave and the cultrue where I grew up. Not that everyone had it. One of my fondest memories of my father was how he courageously opposed it. Relatives and neighbours looks when a Jewish friend came to our house as a guest at mealtimes while the neighbours scowled when they looked at the logo on our guest’s company truck.
    At any rate; about wondering how I could miss something simple; the memories of how often I’ve heard that “simple” is never easy, but rather a stroke of genius. In this case simple and perfect Genius.
    And as for miraculous. Right up there with the burning bush, and so “in my face” that I couldn’t see it.
    As startled as I’ve been by how well God fits even the most unpleasant and ill intentioned occurences into His plan (such as the many times that people’s self imposed suffering tempering them like the finest steel) I’m glad to see that He continues to startle me.
    Thank you so much for this post.

  6. Janet Kingan says:

    As a Jewish convert to Catholicism I come up against this from time to time. Once, someone, not knowing my background, said, “well. WE ALL know who REALLY killed Christ.” Picking up on it I said ” You mean the Jews?, Then I guess He didn’t die for you, since you must be perfect!” He was not amused and bragged about his 12 years of Catholic education.

    The DRE of my parish was there with me an her jaw was on the floor in shock. I just said, “Welcome to my life…..;-)”

Leave a Reply